"Tomorrow is not guaranteed." ~ old adage
Common thinking is to wait until 70 if one can afford it and is healthy in order to receive a higher Social Security payment. Mathematically, that seems to be good advice. However, life happens.
Below is a link to an article in which the person regrets waiting until 70 and his reasons.
Here's a summary of the article:
- Hidden Tax Trap. That higher income pushes him into brackets where more of his Social Security gets taxed, and his Medicare premiums get hit with surcharges. He's essentially penalized for following conventional wisdom about waiting until 70.
- Health Gets Worse. He spent years in my late sixties staying healthy, exercising, and planning for a long retirement. Then at 72, he was diagnosed with a serious condition that limits my mobility and energy. Those extra years between 67 and 70 when he could have truly enjoyed his benefits are gone forever.
- Breakeven math is just theoretical. The break-even point for waiting until 70 compared to benefits claimed at age 67 is approximately age 82. But that calculation assumes everything stays constant – your health, Medicare costs, tax brackets, and Social Security's future stability. Life happens.
- Missed Experiences. While he was dutifully waiting until 70, his neighbor who claimed at 62 was traveling the world. She's now 67 and has already received five years of checks that someone waiting until 70 hasn't gotten, allowing her to travel and enjoy life.
- Social Security May Cut Benefits. He delayed for maximum benefits that might not even be guaranteed when potential cuts come in 2033 or 34.
- Could Have Done Well Investing. With a 4 percent real return, a person has to live to 89, instead of 78, for it to be beneficial to delay benefits from age 67 to 70, yet 77 percent of 67-year-old males and 65 percent of 67-year-old females die before 89.
- Spousal Benefits Delayed. His spouse could have been receiving 50% of my full retirement age benefit for three additional years, but instead got nothing while he chased those delayed retirement credits. That's money they'll never get back.
- Worried More About Market Fluctuations. During those three years he delayed Social Security, he had to rely more heavily on my 401(k) and other investments for living expenses.
- Extra Cash Would Have Been Useful. Between ages 67 and 70, he faced unexpected expenses: home repairs, medical bills, and helping his adult children through financial challenges.
- Having Money Sooner Is Better. Looking back, he realize he treated Social Security like a pure investment decision when it should have been a lifestyle choice. If he could do it over again, he'd claim at full retirement age and use those three extra years of benefits to truly enjoy the beginning of his retirement while he was still healthy enough to make the most of it.
I agree with many of his points since I took Social Security early at 64 and avoided experiencing many of reasons for his regret.
This is not financial, Social Security, nor investment advice. Please consult a professional advisor.
Copyright © 2025 Achievement Catalyst, LLC